If you live in the US, this chart is your best place to start looking. International posters outside the US may have region specific options not shown here!
Need a VIN checked? Search the catalog (https://boards.4chan.org/o/catalog) for an existing VIN check thread before making your own.
>MODERN TRUCKS ARE TOO BIG!What's with reddit and their incorrect opinions about modern trucks?
>>27618807It's jarring on compact trucks in particular
>>27618807>>27620286The new ranger and the new colorado are better in every way, cope
>>27620395>more electronics>weigh more>worse visibility>garbage drivetrains>cost the same as a full sizehow exactly?
>>27620464>garbage drivetrainsThey actually outperform the old ones by a lot
>>27620395So you agree that the newer trucks are bigger? Sounds like you're the one coping. Or you're just mindbroken over the BLOAT.
wee strom edition!>Motorcycle tips and tricks>Motorcycle pics webms and streamies>cb500 leg legion association guild clan>How Ya Been posting>Tennyfren camp HQ>rip gn, rip indian, rip kiwi anon>motorcycle anime girls>personal attacks based on brand preference>tendy rating services>scooters are frensMEET, FIGHT and FUCK!>(New map! Email dbtmap3@gmail.com with pic of bike (hosted) and location to be added):Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
I'd love to get my hands on the scumfuck who stripped these bolts
>>27618685doesn't painting your bike not last at all? I've never heard good things about DIY paintjobs
>>27620626I used to painy my shitbikes. It was an annual ritual. Put enough clear coat on and it is fine for the year. Next spring just strip it and put a new scheme on it. Easy.
>>27620605I pretty much agree. Something to compete with the T7 or the Tuareg would've probably made more money, assuming they could hit the same price point. If the fucking Italians can do it, surely Harley can.
>>27620605>like all the 1%er faggots say about Sportsters.says the 99%er who cucks to the authorities, you're in no place to talk shit man
>stupid trucktard stop making threads about tr-ACK!
>>27620447damn, car hadn't even stopped moving and he was already firing. Truggfags can't match those reflexes
>>27620447what the heck is the context here?
>>27620618Trucklet on drugs didnt like being passed by chad corvette, followed him home and road raged
>>27620624okay but why is he ass naked
https://www.insure.com/download/press-room/attractive-men-drive-black-ford-pickup-trucks.pdf>At the top of the list, the survey determined that women find a man who climbs up and into a big black Ford pickup truck to be among the most sponge-worthy guys on the road. “A full-size truck implies that you can fix a leaky pipe, and regular $100 fill-ups suggest that you’re not money-obsessive,” explains the website’s editorial director. “(The) $100 fill-ups also suggest that you regularly have $100.”>Here’s the vehicle types women find most attractive among male drivers:>Pickup trucks: 32 percent.>Sports cars: 27 percent.
>>27620559>reddit spacing
>>27620534>t. doesn't own a muscle car
>>27620597See >>27620552Your celibacy-induced, knee-jerk reaction to my post caused your brain to sperg out and not understand the post. And now you're in a fit of rage and you will be incapable of admitting you misunderstood the post. You aren't doing these things to get laid, as your niggerbrain assumed
>>27620552fuck off anon people that do everything to get women like you are incels.
>>27620623>fit of ragehuh? I'm here chillin. you already typed more than me, you lost
>think the idea of a smallish off-roader is cool>don't want to pay out the ass for a ww2 era one that's going on 80 years old>not willing to drive anything with a Chrysler/Jeep enginewhat's the ideal car? old bronco/blazer? SBC swapped wrangler? suzuki samurai?
>>27619901>safetyCorners got cut.>build qualityCorners got cut.
>>27620321>1950s problemsWtf are you talking about? Can you name a single one? Show me your bus pass junior
https://youtu.be/qPDkioGP2jc?si=4USfITUk4VqhrUko
>>27620408Just one? Easy. Having reverse flow heads in the 21st century is already a dealbreaker.
>>27619716UTVs from the likes of Polaris and Can-Am are the spiritual successor to the old Willys Jeeps.
Perfect daily does not exi..
>>27619737That's not a Fiesta ST
>>27619737>fake "quad" exhaust on a four cylinderExplain that one
>>27619739Im a weebcel and I like it VW made it fun to drive with the new rear diff that lets it power oversteer like a Focus RS/GR Corolla and the 2.0T is a great engine after making it for 15+ years.I like the GR more but the R is a good car, sad that VW is discontinuing manuals. If it was $5-8000 less it would get more positive attention but you can get one below MSRP.
>>27619737I'm confused why retards in the thread want, incredibly exhilarating, sporty, manual, canon carvers as a fucking daily to go to groceries... This seems more than enough, fuck even the GTI would be more than enough.
>>27619737Whats the maintenance costs on an R?
>dumbass neighbor buys a new truck>it's too big to fit in his driveway >he parks it on the street instead >truck is too wide and takes up over half the width of the street >call my cousin at the precinct >they send cop over >cop calls in a tow because fucker is blocking the road get fucked you retard
Hey /n/igger, make sure you don't miss my truck threads, check the catalog and seethe at the fact /o/ isn't ur anti-truck safespace.
>>27611369kek is that an f250r?those are fuckin badass trucks, expensive as shit
>>27618462well said, fellow ladypede
>>27618584ya got him bra
>>27612734I believe you're right that there's legislation for that in place everywhere but if you move to a remote area of the bible belt, you can build whatever you want and nobody will EVER check you on that shit if it doesn't bother someone else.
Why do you hate me, /o/?
>>27620388https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D6OmFYdrHFg
>>27620452>Anyway, the snap oversteer in an FWD or FWD-biased car that is front-heavy (so exactly like described in >>27620292) is a thing and by coincidence this is the thing Karens have no idea of, they think FWD is saferNo you don't understand. Lift off and snap oversteer is almost impossible to do in 90% of the fwd platforms people drive in america. The car is literally made to keep itself straight through unstable maneuvers. Examples of lightweight stuff like the corsa or older civics are totally different cars from things like honda pilots, cx5s, etc. On a 3500-4000lb suv, the automatic transmission and soft suspension soak up any hard transfer of energy while keeping a load on the front wheels. This marres any sharp transfer of energy so the car doesn't spin out, and instead it understeers. This is a visible fact about the average household fwd. Lift off oversteer and snap oversteer exist only in a sports context, or lightweight cars with a very biased weight distribution and poorly made or sporty predisposition. Karens think fwd is safe because it is safe. fwd and awd are leagues safer than rwd, especially in bad road conditions. Just because you can find a few videos of eg hatches spinning out doesn't mean Carrie's nissan rogue is now an sw20
>>27620508>things like honda pilots, cx5sDon't they have better weight distribution?>the automatic transmission doesn't take any part in this>Karens think fwd is safe because it is safe. fwd and awd are leagues safer than rwdAs you wish. Don't need to be upset.
>>27620536>Don't they have better weight distribution?Maybe but not by much>doesn't take any part in thisIt very much does, because engine load on the drivetrain isn't removed completely like it is in a manual, which is what you do when braking in a manual. Load on the front wheels keeps a car more stable. In fact this is also the case in a rwd, as 'lift off oversteer' is literally the cause of the loss of traction in an mr platform like an mr2 or porsche.>as you wishIt sounds like you might have some sort of mental condition or something, so I'll keep it in simple terms. Companies don't build safety features off of theory or opinions. They test for multiple hazards and conditions. In every situation, fwd is safer than a given rwd counterpart. Awd is the safest. In any car that is unsafe as a fwd, rwd is less safe. A heavily front biased weight distribution is not great in a fwd, but its horrendous in a rwd, where the powered wheels are unloaded. If you know how a skateboard is to ride, you'll know its extremely hard to unintentionally slide one. The same principle is true in a fwd commuter car, where the car is usually heavy in general, but it also has softer and more suspension travel than something sporty. This means the rear wheels, which are always responsible for maintaining a straight line, always have traction. It is next to impossible to get rear, unsteered and undriven, loaded wheels to kick out on these cars. In most cases, the car will flip before it loses traction in the rear. You can see this a lot with suvs actually. Its a testament to how poor these vehicles are at changing direction quickly.
>>27620488skill issue
There is no reason ever for any motor vehicle that is not a race car to go triple digits in speedEvery automaker should by law be required to place a small bomb inside the transmission tunnel of every car that is set to detonate once the driver exceeds 100mph all older cars should also retroactively have them equipped with bombs too.
back to /n/ faggot troon
>>27619068>oh no no no you got 100mph>bad people you make me angry>waaaa I'm a babyFucking cut your own rests 90 to 100 are thrilling. If I or other anons kill anyone I garauntee is a car with 5~7 non-english speaking browns in it. Mostly children
>>27620516>90 to 100 is thrillingmaybe if you're inexperienced or in a shitbox100 mph is the minimum for me to pay attention to what i'm doing135 mph is thrilling175 mph is scary200 mph is scary on an empty road in a straight lineMultiply these numbers by 2/3 for residential roads
i commute on this road, give me a single good reason why i shouldn't do 140 on it
>>27620516I have to agree with >>27620604 , if you think 100mph is thrilling you're probably a weenie. On my first HPDE day at age 17 I went 100 and it really wasn't anything to write home about.
Convince me out of buying this truck
>>27619985I don’t understand the point of these gussed up quarter ton pickups, they can’t have the ass to carry anything substantial and you would probably be served better by some jeep for less money for off-roading. Or even modifying a half ton or bigger.
>>27620510Cause they sexy
>>27620510I don't get the point of using a tiny and underpowered V6 or i4 platform as an off road base. As far as the pickup variants to they pretty much always have shitty ass tire clearance. It usually takes a suspension lift, body lift and cutting and fender flares to fit tiny 33's on these cuck trucks. By the time you add all that shit you're pretty much the size of a half ton. Oh and don't forget a re-gear because of the cuck drivetrain.
>>27620568Off roaders need less power than any other car. You’re not hauling ass off road so even 200hp is plenty.
>>27620599>Off roaders need less power than any other carahahahah what? Let me guess... You're going to use gearing to compensate for having no power? Okay. Have fun generating zero wheelspeed or momentum and having to winch up everything. Crawling is for babies.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5zpdGfSPDc0>You’re not hauling ass off road so even 200hp is plenty.What about the 50+ miles of highway driving to the trailhead? What about the other 99% of the time when you have to daily drive it in the city? 200hp is not "plenty" when you have big tires.
Give me one good reason why I shouldn't.They seem to be getting cheaper and I think they may be entering their rock-bottom price before they either stay for a bit or clean ones start appreciating. I know they aren't designed to be fast but as someone who used to own a NA Miata driving feel and handling maters more to me than speed. I've read the 2nd gen ones have some oil starvation issues when you're really pushing them but I haven't seen the same for the 1st gen ones.Benchracers will be ignored.
>>27619190If you're buying a brand new sports car that doesn't make at least 300 at the tire what the fuck are you doing? This isn't 1998. The sports in sports car comes from motorsports, where you want large amounts of horsepower, not less than your mom's SUV. Why would you purposely buy something slow, if you want great driving feel without any power I guess you could get a go-kart or a Miata? You powercuck fags confuse me. You can't even pull pussy in that. Girls aren't going to be impressed by your curb weight or autocross times. They want something that accelerates fast as hell, and has a badass engine that makes a lot of noise. The kind of car that doesn't ask for your respect, it gains it effortlessly. Be a man. Stop compromising. Buy a corvette.
>>27620400Sorry but you're a retard who validates identities off what your dad told you and its clear to see. What really determines a sports car is its power to weight ratio. Anything more than 13/1 weight to power is not a sports car.At 13/1, a 3500lb car would make 270hp, which is not far from the figures on a v6 camaro. An frs in its final rendition made 200hp at 2800lbs, which puts it at a 14/1 ratio, making it short of this figure. Couple that with the torque it makes, which is 150, and it can barely get itself underway
>>27620400girls associate corvettes with corny white man balding mid life crisis cope. the only pussy you will get is from 50 year old blown out hags at jon bon jovi concerts
>>27620358nothing gets past you pal
>>27620400>buying a car because you seek validation from womenReal talk anon, this is retarded. The kind of woman who will pretend to be impressed by your c4 is just looking for her next dick to infect with whatever STDs she has.Beyond that, buying a car to get validation from others is dumber than a box of rocks. It's like buying a Stanley mug or whatever the latest trendy thing is. Also,>stop compromising>buy a corvette >picrel is an 85-87 c4Anon, your car has a 230hp L98, and in all likelihood has a 700r4 4-speed auto. You're not really in any position to judge anyone.
>research links a desire to own loud cars to higher levels of sadism and psychopathy.https://www.sciencealert.com/study-links-preference-for-loud-cars-to-some-unsurprising-personality-traitsThe science is settled chuds
>>27619807Too crowded here.
>>27619684Based fellow asian man. America is ours.
>>27619857
>>27609960My own research has concluded that op is a fag.
>>27619342jeet in the street>>27619684small penis
>Gas prices perpetually increasing>Dramatic rises due to war>High IQ people are seeking to maximize MPG's>Low IQ people choose to he poorHow are you holding up anons?You are getting 2000 miles per gallon, aren't you?
>>27619398Anom, its great that you are trying, but that's like 42mpg.42mpg is bad.
>>27619415It's about the same as the hybrid Toyota options without needing all the extra bullshit, so in my books that's really good.
>>27619426That just means they are equally bad though.Also what "extra bullshit" do toyota hybrids need exactly?Granted, toyota hybrids are the lowest tier hybrids out there.
>>27616069that's a Hyundai you fucking retard
>>27619426Hybrid Toyotas are pushing 60mpg. You're getting worse economy than anon's X5 which is a 6000lbs luxobarge SUV
Toyota's new EV line is made in partnership with Chinese brand BYD. So would the car be Chinese or Japanese.
>>27620308What happens if I protest Israel in America?
>>27620359China and the CCP has nothing to do with the cold war, or us vs them. They're not even communist. The CCP exists to empower the guy at the top, and all people are subserviant. China must get gains from any and all parties and persons. Xi is the ruler of the world.
>>27620380I don't care what happens to university commies
>>27620403lol
>>27620392Praise Emperor XiWIENER THE POOP IS GOD
