Go /p/ro: • Please post images that are JPG format and ideally smaller than 1 MB, and/or about 1000 pixels on the longest side. • Expect to be judged harshly. Learn to deal with it. Want: • We come here for photos, so post yours as often as possible, even if "image unrelated" to your text. • "Flickr/500px/Tumblr/Facebook/Portfolio" threads are for critique and networking. • Use "Recent Photos" threads if you are shy or only want to post a couple of photos. • Shared raw files which we can collectively edit for discussion of post-processing techniques, are encouraged. • Use the Catalog to consolidate similar topics (photographic themes, images or technical gear threads). Do not want: • Go to /wsr/ or /r/ for specific Photoshop requests. • Gear threads are discouraged, but identified as necessary. Many users simply hide these threads. Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
Pentax 645n editionPrevious thread>>4307062/fgt/ daily reminder (courtesy by anon): one stop per decade is (generally) bullshit>negative film ages better than positive>black and white better than color>slow films better than fast>storage conditions (dry/cool) matter more than years>Negative film is shot 1 or 2 stops overexposed and then PULLED in development so that you build more density in the exposure and develop less such that the fog is limited>slide/positive film is shot at box speed or overexposed and pulled.>if you home develop you can also use benzotriazole as a restrainer for the the first developer in E6 processUseful linksComment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>4309039I shot expired tri-x at 200 and it still came out even grainier than usual. Overexpose for sure.
>>4309014>extra stop of toneh? Can you translate this to plain English for those of us without brain damage?
>>4309051>I had a custom cam made! True rich bois found the thread it sounds like.
>>4309099You want to play with the big boys, you gotta pay like the big boys, faggot.
>>4309088>>4309099>>4309100>>4309110>>4309124Let me guess, you "need" more?
Are there any anons here practicing erotic photography? How do you find your models willing to pose for such photos? Or do you have to pay them?
I do periodically. Don't come off as a creep and don't be too fat and people will work with you. See if there are any TFP groups on FB or IG in your area. Show them what it is you're wanting to do especially Helmut Newton's stuff, he works with mirrors which is also my thing.If you want IG e-thots who have to be directed and flake on you, do TFP, but if you want experienced people who will show up and know what they're doing, pay. I have 4 shoots lined up for middle of May and one of them I'm paying and she has been published several times, signed on with an agency. Something to think about.>>4308687>Based WestonLearn how to do solarization and take another swing at this composition, would be bad ass.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpi
>>4308837How often do the models hit on you or give off dtf vibes?
>>4308837I’ve seen solarization edits on digital, is that possible or it’s analog only? Happy to read up on it if you have any material you can link.
>>4308837>I have 4 shoots lined up for middle of May and one of them I'm payingJust imagine paying a tattooed whore with single mom tits to take photos of her to boost her confidence. The absolute state of incels.
>>4309096Well, honestly, met my current GF that way. Doesn't happen often. If you're using your camera to get laid you are fucking pathetic. Mine just happened but if you are intentionally going out there to take pictures of naked chicks for the sole purpose of trolling for pussy you are an incel and need to hang yourself faggot>>4309105I'm honestly not sure how you would do it on digital. But this guy knows.https://www.all-about-photo.com/photo-articles/photo-article/823/how-to-create-a-solarization-effect-using-lightroom-or-photoshop>>4309106You left out this part poorfag>but if you want experienced people who will show up and know what they're doing, pay.Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
Scored one for cheap. Been playing around with it today.. had lots of fun. Not ultra sharp, but it makes up for it in how compact and easy it is to manage.Seems strange that nobody has bothered making these ultra compact mirror lenses in the modern age up until NISI's recent announcement.Will the new NISI be sharper than the OG?[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width810Image Height578Scene Capture TypeStandard
>>4309119post your pics
Used my art lens for the first time in a long time. Didnt have much time to compose these photos but I had fun taking them![EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareCapture One 15 MacintoshImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Width2048Image Height1365
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareCapture One 15 MacintoshImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Width2048Image Height693
>>4309004>the only non blurry mess is a photo of other photosreally makes you think
>>4309064imagine if OP had started with this one
she looks like she does stinky poos
>>4308391sleep demon
why are shitty digital cameras getting expensive now? did I miss some e-celeb video?
>>4307344>they're lucky if they have a pot a piss inAt least they have a street to shit on.
>>4308661ogei, tard :DDD
>>4307416>I'm too autistic to negotiateWhat does this even mean?
>>4308665Means i pay whatever the seller wants. I look for underpriced items.
Sold 3 digishitters to zoomer girls this week. Made a whooping $250.
the retarded abstract photographer is here. again...I did not die.
old but good
mind-bending colour toning editionPreviously: >>4304692[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakePENTAX CorporationCamera ModelPENTAX K10DCamera SoftwareRawTherapee 5.8Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)54 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image Width3888Image Height2608Compression SchemeUncompressedPixel CompositionRGBImage OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Data ArrangementChunky FormatImage Created2006:08:09 09:39:25Exposure Time1/1000 secF-Numberf/11.0Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating400Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModeCenter Weighted AverageFlashNo FlashFocal Length36.00 mmRenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceManualScene Capture TypeStandardContrastNormalSaturationLowSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeDistant View
>>4308954Then I shall retract my statement
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATIONCamera ModelNIKON Z 9Camera SoftwareCapture One 15 MacintoshSensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)40 mmImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiExposure Time1/1600 secF-Numberf/4.0Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating64Lens Aperturef/4.0Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo FlashFocal Length40.00 mmImage Width1333Image Height2000RenderingCustomExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlNoneContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknown
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeSIGMACamera ModelSIGMA fpCamera SoftwareAdobe Lightroom 9.2.2 (Android)Maximum Lens Aperturef/5.0Focal Length (35mm Equiv)41 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image Created2024:04:19 11:19:41Exposure Time1/40 secF-Numberf/4.8Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating100Lens Aperturef/4.8Brightness5.6 EVExposure Bias0 EVSubject Distance20.12 mMetering ModeSpotLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length41.10 mmColor Space InformationsRGB
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeRICOH IMAGING COMPANY, LTD.Camera ModelRICOH GR IIICamera SoftwareGIMP 2.10.8Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)28 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2024:04:30 17:40:34Exposure Time1/80 secF-Numberf/8.0Exposure ProgramNormal ProgramISO Speed Rating200Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length18.30 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width6000Image Height4000RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardContrastHardSaturationHighSharpnessHardSubject Distance RangeDistant View
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS 90DCamera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 13.2 (Windows)Maximum Lens Aperturef/4.6Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2024:04:30 19:00:45Exposure Time1/2000 secF-Numberf/4.5Exposure ProgramShutter PriorityISO Speed Rating3200Lens Aperturef/4.5Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternFlashNo FlashFocal Length100.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBRenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandard
When you realize editing photos sucks and you should of just brought a Fuji...
>>4309017>>4308993No photos? I thought you could edit in 3 minutes :^(
>>4309045Fuck off, manchild. Get some lessons on basic social interaction from your dad next time.
>>4309045XD
>>4309045You're a pissy fujislug who is asking this when you're already mad because we shit on fuji. In a gear thread, where you tried to pretend foolji has redeeming qualities. I've learned you are literally the last person on /p/ who should get photos when they ask. I did post a few in /rpt/ today. Have fun schizzing out. Editing is simple, fuji jpegs look like shit, fuji cameras are built like shit, simple as.
>>4309098all trueif i wanted a small non weather sealed apsc id buy a ricoh gr and shoot raw
What kind of camera do I need if I want to do sharp city photography. Does a FF sensor body not cut it anymore ? Or do I just some ultrasharp lens?[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:PhotographerAJImage-Specific Properties:
>>4309076That’s a fair point, right now I have a mix of crop and full lenses. I do like the 55-300 and will miss it if I move to FF[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:PhotographerAJImage-Specific Properties:
>>4309062Sinar kit for like 600 with a 90mm lens that includes a few sheet film holders.200ish or less for all developing stuff85 for a 50 pack of foma100.Just gotta hunt on ebay. You can get really good deals on sinar kits.
>>4309062https://www.ebay.com/itm/375364284290The 90mm super angulonhttps://www.ebay.com/itm/204713663447
>>4309095>this lens is rated as POOR with fungus and a broken shutter lock>this camera is near mint except for all the damaged parts I won’t be getting these but it gives me an idie of what to look for. Are there any big problems I should avoid with a 4x5 camera?
>>4309101Lol woops. Sorry, I just hastily found those 2. The main thing is that the bellows are light tight. Make sure the film holder/ground glass is there also.With sinar it isn't too big of a deal because the bellows are easily interchangeable, but if you get a field camera it can be a big chore to replace them.
Post scanning rigs. Apparently the main caveat of buying a dedicated scanner is slow as shit workflow, having to edit the picture with shitty software BEFORE moving to the next frame, and feed it manually yet.Have you built a scanning rig? Did you order the kit online? What can you make a backlight of? How do you ensure the camera is completely perpendicular and the film is correctly aligned? Tell me ideas to feed the negatives without scratching them.I have a Nikon D3300 with the kit 18-55 zoom. I've read most use a 55mm macro prime. I only have the kit lens and some "macro" extension rings. Is that good enough?Pic not mine, but an interesting setup.
>>4308921get an old scuzzy piece of shit, i know u wont regret it[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNikonCamera ModelLS-2000Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CC 2018 (Windows)Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2024:03:10 18:34:19Color Space InformationsRGBImage Width1500Image Height1017
>>4308517The camera is nice and all but I’m getting moist at that beautiful test gear in the background.
well it "works" by some descriptionThe hugin auto-align scatters the images randomly. It's probably confused by the heavy vignetting. Also the image was taken on a shitty box camera so there's not much detail for it to latch onto.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakePentaxCamera ModelK-7Camera SoftwareGIMP 2.10.36Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2024:04:30 16:34:31Color Space InformationsRGB
Do any of you make money scanning film for others?
The naive imagemagick strategy would almost work, if it weren't for that awful vignettingseems like exposure is a bit uneven too, not sure what's up with that[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareGIMP 2.10.36Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2024:04:30 18:03:19White Point Chromaticity0.3Color Space InformationsRGB
what do you think the custom recipe mike_sunday used on these? he's not telling in the comments. gotta respect the hustle[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:
>>4307829fucking sherlock ova here
what is this
please let this thread be bait. these shots are horrible
>>4308813Instagram “photography” scene would make your head explode if you think this sample is bad lmao.
>>4308848>open insta to dump some recent pics>loads of "sponsored" (i.e. people paid for it) photography profiles pop up in my feed that are some of the lamest boring bullshit to ever grace my eyeballsPain
Just "found" this same camera. Pretty much brand new. How much can i scalp a retard hipster for it?[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiColor Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width1414Image Height2000
>>4308701>>4308767>>4308788If you don't mind being limited to wide angles.
>>4307849give it back Jamal
>>4308696i'm sorry, i get a little spicy sometimes.
How much better is a full frame camera than an APS-C
>>43090931.5x better>>4308806Nikon made a nifty fifty sized 40mm f2Sony made "film sized" 24, 35, 40, and 50s (but slower, f2.5-f2.8)Sigma made a "film sized" 90mm f2.8Small lenses are possible, but unwanted because most customers are pros or larpers that want f1.2 for the brides bokeh fetish
Pre-summer 2024 editionAll video related questions and discussion is intended for this thread. Here we discuss techniques, gear and anything else related to capturing video footage. Please don't pretend to be an expert if you don't know what you're talking about. Kindly leave your ego at the door.Posting short films/scripts or other work you've done is encouraged.We tend to use and recommend DSLRs/mirrorless cameras because they provide phenomenal picture quality for their price, have large sensors (ie the same size used in high-end cinema cameras and higher) and have interchangeable lenses.In contrast, consumer camcorders often have much smaller sensors and a fixed lens.>STICKY - https://text.is/QZ1J>Helpful guide, additional books and more in-depth FAQs - https://web.archive.org/web/20200926115310/https://pastebin.com/kG0gRmTZ>NO ONE CARES WHAT AN EXPERT YOU THINK YOU ARE. IF YOU’RE ASKING BASIC-AS-SHIT QUESTIONS, YOU CAN’T BE ALL THAT GREAT. SEE ABOVEPrevious thread >>4294741Quick FAQSComment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>4309053Actually sorry for spamming, one more reply, if anyone is interested about Sundance documentaries of the last couple of years and what they were shot on.>2024https://www.indiewire.com/gallery/sundance-2024-cinematography-documentaries/and-so-it-begins-bruce-sakaki-cinematographer/>2023https://www.indiewire.com/feature/sundance-documentary-cameras-lens-equipment-sony-canon-1234801323/>2022https://www.indiewire.com/features/general/film-cameras-documentary-sundance-arri-canon-blackmagic-1234693570/Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
post pics you absolute subhumans
>>4309077Of what? Spiderman?
>>4309078kek, spidermans are fine too, but make them cinematographic
I finally got the used arri alexa studio camcorder I ordered. That thing is built like a tank. It looks like it can be used for shoulder mount because it comes with a shoulder pad. It’s so freaking heavy. Who could carry that camera on their shoulder for a whole shoot day? Hercules or He-Man!
TWENTY-FOUR - FIFTY - ONE HUNDRED AND THIRY-FIVE is the way to go AND YOU KNOW IT!
>>4304476OP agrees.
>>4302645dangerously based
>>4302433>was first using 35 85 135>got a 21>sold the 35>nowtheresabiggap.arw>got a 55>stopped using 21 and 85 altogether>stuck with using only 55 and 135 to this daysometimes i wish a had a super wide like 21 or 18 just to see what else kind of compositions i can come up with for my scene but other than that, i can do literally ANYTHING with just 55 and 135
>>430243335 prime70-300 zoom
>>4307239but you do have a 21
